Costa Rica vs Panama: 11_SDR allocation
11_SDR allocation over time
- Costa Rica
- Panama
How they compare
Panama currently reports 757.08 million against 692.56 million in Costa Rica, a difference of 64.52 million.
That makes Panama's figure about 1.1 times Costa Rica's.
Across all 37 years both countries report, Panama has been ahead every year.
Costa Rica ranks 95th and Panama ranks 92nd of 189 countries.
Panama has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 33.06 million | 36.67 million | 3.61 million | Panama |
| 2000s | 33.95 million | 37.67 million | 3.71 million | Panama |
| 2010s | 229.87 million | 289.31 million | 59.44 million | Panama |
| 2020s | 553.60 million | 615.47 million | 61.87 million | Panama |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 11_sdr allocation, Costa Rica or Panama?
- Panama, at 757.08 million against 692.56 million in Costa Rica as of 2026.
- What is the difference in 11_sdr allocation between Costa Rica and Panama?
- 64.52 million, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Panama?
- 37 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2026.
- How do Costa Rica and Panama rank globally for 11_sdr allocation?
- Costa Rica ranks 95th and Panama ranks 92nd of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- IMF, published as 11_SDR allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
SDRs are international reserve assets created by the IMF and allocated to members to supplement existing official reserves. Holdings of SDRs by an IMF member are recorded as an asset, while the allocation of SDRs is recorded as the incurrence of a liability of the member receiving them. The membership of the SDR Department incurs the asset and liability position among themselves, not with the IMF. The holdings and allocations should be shown gross, rather than netted (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, sixth edition (BPM6)).