Congo vs Haiti: 11_SDR allocation

Congo
312.19 million
in 2025
Haiti
312.91 million
in 2025
Congo rank
134th
Haiti rank
133rd

11_SDR allocation over time

  • Congo
  • Haiti
0100.0M200.0M300.0M199020072025

How they compare

Haiti currently reports 312.91 million against 312.19 million in Congo, a difference of 724,000.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Haiti ahead.

Congo ranks 134th and Haiti ranks 133rd of 188 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 2 and Haiti in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Haiti Difference Ahead
1990s 13.54 million 19.08 million 5.54 million Haiti
2000s 13.91 million 19.60 million 5.69 million Haiti
2010s 117.02 million 115.29 million 1.73 million Congo
2020s 247.64 million 247.58 million 58,833 Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 11_sdr allocation, Congo or Haiti?
Haiti, at 312.91 million against 312.19 million in Congo as of 2025.
What is the difference in 11_sdr allocation between Congo and Haiti?
724,000, with Haiti ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Haiti?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Congo and Haiti rank globally for 11_sdr allocation?
Congo ranks 134th and Haiti ranks 133rd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
IMF, published as 11_SDR allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
11_SDR allocation
Source
IMF
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
189 places, 6,685 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

SDRs are international reserve assets created by the IMF and allocated to members to supplement existing official reserves. Holdings of SDRs by an IMF member are recorded as an asset, while the allocation of SDRs is recorded as the incurrence of a liability of the member receiving them. The membership of the SDR Department incurs the asset and liability position among themselves, not with the IMF. The holdings and allocations should be shown gross, rather than netted (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, sixth edition (BPM6)).