Colombia vs New Zealand: 11_SDR allocation
11_SDR allocation over time
- Colombia
- New Zealand
How they compare
Colombia currently reports 3.58 billion against 2.73 billion in New Zealand, a difference of 855.74 million.
That makes Colombia's figure about 1.3 times New Zealand's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was New Zealand ahead.
Colombia ranks 51st and New Zealand ranks 54th of 188 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Colombia averaged higher in 1 and New Zealand in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 159.20 million | 196.88 million | 37.69 million | New Zealand |
| 2000s | 163.52 million | 202.23 million | 38.71 million | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 1.08 billion | 1.25 billion | 169.51 million | New Zealand |
| 2020s | 2.76 billion | 2.24 billion | 524.01 million | Colombia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 11_sdr allocation, Colombia or New Zealand?
- Colombia, at 3.58 billion against 2.73 billion in New Zealand as of 2025.
- What is the difference in 11_sdr allocation between Colombia and New Zealand?
- 855.74 million, with Colombia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and New Zealand?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Colombia and New Zealand rank globally for 11_sdr allocation?
- Colombia ranks 51st and New Zealand ranks 54th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- IMF, published as 11_SDR allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
SDRs are international reserve assets created by the IMF and allocated to members to supplement existing official reserves. Holdings of SDRs by an IMF member are recorded as an asset, while the allocation of SDRs is recorded as the incurrence of a liability of the member receiving them. The membership of the SDR Department incurs the asset and liability position among themselves, not with the IMF. The holdings and allocations should be shown gross, rather than netted (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, sixth edition (BPM6)).