Chad vs North Macedonia: 11_SDR allocation

Chad
249.79 million
in 2025
North Macedonia
265.86 million
in 2025
Chad rank
146th
North Macedonia rank
143rd

11_SDR allocation over time

  • Chad
  • North Macedonia
0100.0M200.0M300.0M199020072025

How they compare

North Macedonia currently reports 265.86 million against 249.79 million in Chad, a difference of 16.07 million.

That makes North Macedonia's figure about 1.1 times Chad's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Chad ahead.

Chad ranks 146th and North Macedonia ranks 143rd of 188 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 2 and North Macedonia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chad North Macedonia Difference Ahead
1990s 13.11 million 8.31 million 4.80 million Chad
2000s 13.46 million 11.99 million 1.47 million Chad
2010s 78.74 million 96.36 million 17.62 million North Macedonia
2020s 193.44 million 209.85 million 16.41 million North Macedonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 11_sdr allocation, Chad or North Macedonia?
North Macedonia, at 265.86 million against 249.79 million in Chad as of 2025.
What is the difference in 11_sdr allocation between Chad and North Macedonia?
16.07 million, with North Macedonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and North Macedonia?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Chad and North Macedonia rank globally for 11_sdr allocation?
Chad ranks 146th and North Macedonia ranks 143rd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
IMF, published as 11_SDR allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
11_SDR allocation
Source
IMF
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
189 places, 6,685 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

SDRs are international reserve assets created by the IMF and allocated to members to supplement existing official reserves. Holdings of SDRs by an IMF member are recorded as an asset, while the allocation of SDRs is recorded as the incurrence of a liability of the member receiving them. The membership of the SDR Department incurs the asset and liability position among themselves, not with the IMF. The holdings and allocations should be shown gross, rather than netted (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, sixth edition (BPM6)).