Chad vs Niger: 11_SDR allocation

Chad
249.79 million
in 2025
Niger
251.22 million
in 2025
Chad rank
146th
Niger rank
145th

11_SDR allocation over time

  • Chad
  • Niger
050.0M100.0M150.0M200.0M250.0M199020072025

How they compare

Niger currently reports 251.22 million against 249.79 million in Chad, a difference of 1.43 million.

Across all 36 years both countries report, Niger has been ahead every year.

Chad ranks 146th and Niger ranks 145th of 188 countries.

Niger has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chad Niger Difference Ahead
1990s 13.11 million 13.11 million 0 β€”
2000s 13.46 million 13.46 million 0 β€”
2010s 78.74 million 92.42 million 13.68 million Niger
2020s 193.44 million 198.73 million 5.28 million Niger

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 11_sdr allocation, Chad or Niger?
Niger, at 251.22 million against 249.79 million in Chad as of 2025.
What is the difference in 11_sdr allocation between Chad and Niger?
1.43 million, with Niger ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Niger?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Chad and Niger rank globally for 11_sdr allocation?
Chad ranks 146th and Niger ranks 145th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
IMF, published as 11_SDR allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
11_SDR allocation
Source
IMF
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
189 places, 6,685 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

SDRs are international reserve assets created by the IMF and allocated to members to supplement existing official reserves. Holdings of SDRs by an IMF member are recorded as an asset, while the allocation of SDRs is recorded as the incurrence of a liability of the member receiving them. The membership of the SDR Department incurs the asset and liability position among themselves, not with the IMF. The holdings and allocations should be shown gross, rather than netted (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, sixth edition (BPM6)).