Chad vs Malawi: 11_SDR allocation

Chad
249.79 million
in 2025
Malawi
264.94 million
in 2025
Chad rank
146th
Malawi rank
144th

11_SDR allocation over time

  • Chad
  • Malawi
0100.0M200.0M300.0M199020072025

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 264.94 million against 249.79 million in Chad, a difference of 15.15 million.

That makes Malawi's figure about 1.1 times Chad's.

Across all 36 years both countries report, Malawi has been ahead every year.

Chad ranks 146th and Malawi ranks 144th of 188 countries.

Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chad Malawi Difference Ahead
1990s 13.11 million 15.29 million 2.18 million Malawi
2000s 13.46 million 15.71 million 2.24 million Malawi
2010s 78.74 million 97.46 million 18.72 million Malawi
2020s 193.44 million 209.58 million 16.14 million Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 11_sdr allocation, Chad or Malawi?
Malawi, at 264.94 million against 249.79 million in Chad as of 2025.
What is the difference in 11_sdr allocation between Chad and Malawi?
15.15 million, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Malawi?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Chad and Malawi rank globally for 11_sdr allocation?
Chad ranks 146th and Malawi ranks 144th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
IMF, published as 11_SDR allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
11_SDR allocation
Source
IMF
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
189 places, 6,685 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

SDRs are international reserve assets created by the IMF and allocated to members to supplement existing official reserves. Holdings of SDRs by an IMF member are recorded as an asset, while the allocation of SDRs is recorded as the incurrence of a liability of the member receiving them. The membership of the SDR Department incurs the asset and liability position among themselves, not with the IMF. The holdings and allocations should be shown gross, rather than netted (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, sixth edition (BPM6)).