Canada vs India: 11_SDR allocation

Canada
22.00 billion
in 2025
India
21.99 billion
in 2025
Canada rank
9th
India rank
10th

11_SDR allocation over time

  • Canada
  • India
05.0B10.0B15.0B20.0B25.0B199020072025

How they compare

Canada currently reports 22.00 billion against 21.99 billion in India, a difference of 8.20 million.

Across all 36 years both countries report, Canada has been ahead every year.

Canada ranks 9th and India ranks 10th of 188 countries.

Canada has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Canada India Difference Ahead
1990s 1.09 billion 948.97 million 136.70 million Canada
2000s 1.12 billion 974.77 million 140.41 million Canada
2010s 8.79 billion 5.84 billion 2.95 billion Canada
2020s 17.62 billion 16.68 billion 937.42 million Canada

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 11_sdr allocation, Canada or India?
Canada, at 22.00 billion against 21.99 billion in India as of 2025.
What is the difference in 11_sdr allocation between Canada and India?
8.20 million, with Canada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and India?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Canada and India rank globally for 11_sdr allocation?
Canada ranks 9th and India ranks 10th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
IMF, published as 11_SDR allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
11_SDR allocation
Source
IMF
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
189 places, 6,685 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

SDRs are international reserve assets created by the IMF and allocated to members to supplement existing official reserves. Holdings of SDRs by an IMF member are recorded as an asset, while the allocation of SDRs is recorded as the incurrence of a liability of the member receiving them. The membership of the SDR Department incurs the asset and liability position among themselves, not with the IMF. The holdings and allocations should be shown gross, rather than netted (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, sixth edition (BPM6)).