Cape Verde vs Vanuatu: 11_SDR allocation
11_SDR allocation over time
- Cape Verde
- Vanuatu
How they compare
Vanuatu currently reports 51.92 million against 42.36 million in Cape Verde, a difference of 9.56 million.
That makes Vanuatu's figure about 1.2 times Cape Verde's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Cape Verde ahead.
Cape Verde ranks 168th and Vanuatu ranks 165th of 188 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Cape Verde averaged higher in 2 and Vanuatu in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | Vanuatu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 863,754 | 0 | 863,754 | Cape Verde |
| 2000s | 887,230 | 0 | 887,230 | Cape Verde |
| 2010s | 13.46 million | 23.89 million | 10.42 million | Vanuatu |
| 2020s | 32.84 million | 42.58 million | 9.74 million | Vanuatu |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 11_sdr allocation, Cape Verde or Vanuatu?
- Vanuatu, at 51.92 million against 42.36 million in Cape Verde as of 2025.
- What is the difference in 11_sdr allocation between Cape Verde and Vanuatu?
- 9.56 million, with Vanuatu ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Vanuatu?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Cape Verde and Vanuatu rank globally for 11_sdr allocation?
- Cape Verde ranks 168th and Vanuatu ranks 165th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- IMF, published as 11_SDR allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
SDRs are international reserve assets created by the IMF and allocated to members to supplement existing official reserves. Holdings of SDRs by an IMF member are recorded as an asset, while the allocation of SDRs is recorded as the incurrence of a liability of the member receiving them. The membership of the SDR Department incurs the asset and liability position among themselves, not with the IMF. The holdings and allocations should be shown gross, rather than netted (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, sixth edition (BPM6)).