Cape Verde vs Saint Lucia: 11_SDR allocation
11_SDR allocation over time
- Cape Verde
- Saint Lucia
How they compare
Saint Lucia currently reports 47.58 million against 43.25 million in Cape Verde, a difference of 4.33 million.
That makes Saint Lucia's figure about 1.1 times Cape Verde's.
Across all 37 years both countries report, Saint Lucia has been ahead every year.
Cape Verde ranks 169th and Saint Lucia ranks 167th of 189 countries.
Saint Lucia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | Saint Lucia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 863,754 | 1.03 million | 168,315 | Saint Lucia |
| 2000s | 887,230 | 1.06 million | 174,012 | Saint Lucia |
| 2010s | 13.46 million | 21.39 million | 7.93 million | Saint Lucia |
| 2020s | 34.33 million | 39.55 million | 5.22 million | Saint Lucia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 11_sdr allocation, Cape Verde or Saint Lucia?
- Saint Lucia, at 47.58 million against 43.25 million in Cape Verde as of 2026.
- What is the difference in 11_sdr allocation between Cape Verde and Saint Lucia?
- 4.33 million, with Saint Lucia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Saint Lucia?
- 37 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2026.
- How do Cape Verde and Saint Lucia rank globally for 11_sdr allocation?
- Cape Verde ranks 169th and Saint Lucia ranks 167th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- IMF, published as 11_SDR allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
SDRs are international reserve assets created by the IMF and allocated to members to supplement existing official reserves. Holdings of SDRs by an IMF member are recorded as an asset, while the allocation of SDRs is recorded as the incurrence of a liability of the member receiving them. The membership of the SDR Department incurs the asset and liability position among themselves, not with the IMF. The holdings and allocations should be shown gross, rather than netted (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, sixth edition (BPM6)).