Cape Verde vs Eritrea: 11_SDR allocation

Cape Verde
42.36 million
in 2025
Eritrea
40.39 million
in 2025
Cape Verde rank
168th
Eritrea rank
170th

11_SDR allocation over time

  • Cape Verde
  • Eritrea
010.0M20.0M30.0M40.0M199020072025

How they compare

Cape Verde currently reports 42.36 million against 40.39 million in Eritrea, a difference of 1.98 million.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Cape Verde ahead.

Cape Verde ranks 168th and Eritrea ranks 170th of 188 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Cape Verde averaged higher in 2 and Eritrea in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cape Verde Eritrea Difference Ahead
1990s 863,754 0 863,754 Cape Verde
2000s 887,230 0 887,230 Cape Verde
2010s 13.46 million 22.26 million 8.80 million Eritrea
2020s 32.84 million 34.29 million 1.44 million Eritrea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 11_sdr allocation, Cape Verde or Eritrea?
Cape Verde, at 42.36 million against 40.39 million in Eritrea as of 2025.
What is the difference in 11_sdr allocation between Cape Verde and Eritrea?
1.98 million, with Cape Verde ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Eritrea?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Cape Verde and Eritrea rank globally for 11_sdr allocation?
Cape Verde ranks 168th and Eritrea ranks 170th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
IMF, published as 11_SDR allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
11_SDR allocation
Source
IMF
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
189 places, 6,685 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

SDRs are international reserve assets created by the IMF and allocated to members to supplement existing official reserves. Holdings of SDRs by an IMF member are recorded as an asset, while the allocation of SDRs is recorded as the incurrence of a liability of the member receiving them. The membership of the SDR Department incurs the asset and liability position among themselves, not with the IMF. The holdings and allocations should be shown gross, rather than netted (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, sixth edition (BPM6)).