Burundi vs Mauritius: 11_SDR allocation
11_SDR allocation over time
- Burundi
- Mauritius
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 309.72 million against 294.24 million in Burundi, a difference of 15.47 million.
That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.1 times Burundi's.
Across all 36 years both countries report, Mauritius has been ahead every year.
Burundi ranks 137th and Mauritius ranks 135th of 188 countries.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burundi | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 19.08 million | 21.93 million | 2.85 million | Mauritius |
| 2000s | 19.60 million | 22.53 million | 2.93 million | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 108.45 million | 142.16 million | 33.71 million | Mauritius |
| 2020s | 232.82 million | 253.91 million | 21.09 million | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 11_sdr allocation, Burundi or Mauritius?
- Mauritius, at 309.72 million against 294.24 million in Burundi as of 2025.
- What is the difference in 11_sdr allocation between Burundi and Mauritius?
- 15.47 million, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Mauritius?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Burundi and Mauritius rank globally for 11_sdr allocation?
- Burundi ranks 137th and Mauritius ranks 135th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- IMF, published as 11_SDR allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
SDRs are international reserve assets created by the IMF and allocated to members to supplement existing official reserves. Holdings of SDRs by an IMF member are recorded as an asset, while the allocation of SDRs is recorded as the incurrence of a liability of the member receiving them. The membership of the SDR Department incurs the asset and liability position among themselves, not with the IMF. The holdings and allocations should be shown gross, rather than netted (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, sixth edition (BPM6)).