Burkina Faso vs Fiji: 11_SDR allocation
11_SDR allocation over time
- Burkina Faso
- Fiji
How they compare
Burkina Faso currently reports 234.63 million against 218.93 million in Fiji, a difference of 15.70 million.
That makes Burkina Faso's figure about 1.1 times Fiji's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 37 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Burkina Faso ahead.
Burkina Faso ranks 151st and Fiji ranks 152nd of 189 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 3 and Fiji in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Fiji | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 13.11 million | 9.69 million | 3.41 million | Burkina Faso |
| 2000s | 13.46 million | 9.96 million | 3.51 million | Burkina Faso |
| 2010s | 84.56 million | 98.53 million | 13.97 million | Fiji |
| 2020s | 189.36 million | 182.00 million | 7.36 million | Burkina Faso |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 11_sdr allocation, Burkina Faso or Fiji?
- Burkina Faso, at 234.63 million against 218.93 million in Fiji as of 2026.
- What is the difference in 11_sdr allocation between Burkina Faso and Fiji?
- 15.70 million, with Burkina Faso ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Fiji?
- 37 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2026.
- How do Burkina Faso and Fiji rank globally for 11_sdr allocation?
- Burkina Faso ranks 151st and Fiji ranks 152nd of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- IMF, published as 11_SDR allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
SDRs are international reserve assets created by the IMF and allocated to members to supplement existing official reserves. Holdings of SDRs by an IMF member are recorded as an asset, while the allocation of SDRs is recorded as the incurrence of a liability of the member receiving them. The membership of the SDR Department incurs the asset and liability position among themselves, not with the IMF. The holdings and allocations should be shown gross, rather than netted (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, sixth edition (BPM6)).