Brazil vs Saudi Arabia: 11_SDR allocation
11_SDR allocation over time
- Brazil
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Saudi Arabia currently reports 22.05 billion against 18.27 billion in Brazil, a difference of 3.78 billion.
That makes Saudi Arabia's figure about 1.2 times Brazil's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 37 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 12th and Saudi Arabia ranks 11th of 189 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 2 and Saudi Arabia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 499.68 million | 272.40 million | 227.28 million | Brazil |
| 2000s | 513.26 million | 279.80 million | 233.46 million | Brazil |
| 2010s | 4.24 billion | 9.81 billion | 5.57 billion | Saudi Arabia |
| 2020s | 14.11 billion | 18.30 billion | 4.19 billion | Saudi Arabia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 11_sdr allocation, Brazil or Saudi Arabia?
- Saudi Arabia, at 22.05 billion against 18.27 billion in Brazil as of 2026.
- What is the difference in 11_sdr allocation between Brazil and Saudi Arabia?
- 3.78 billion, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Saudi Arabia?
- 37 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2026.
- How do Brazil and Saudi Arabia rank globally for 11_sdr allocation?
- Brazil ranks 12th and Saudi Arabia ranks 11th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- IMF, published as 11_SDR allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
SDRs are international reserve assets created by the IMF and allocated to members to supplement existing official reserves. Holdings of SDRs by an IMF member are recorded as an asset, while the allocation of SDRs is recorded as the incurrence of a liability of the member receiving them. The membership of the SDR Department incurs the asset and liability position among themselves, not with the IMF. The holdings and allocations should be shown gross, rather than netted (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, sixth edition (BPM6)).