Botswana vs Congo: 11_SDR allocation

Botswana
327.44 million
in 2025
Congo
312.19 million
in 2025
Botswana rank
132nd
Congo rank
134th

11_SDR allocation over time

  • Botswana
  • Congo
0100.0M200.0M300.0M199020072025

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 327.44 million against 312.19 million in Congo, a difference of 15.26 million.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Congo ahead.

Botswana ranks 132nd and Congo ranks 134th of 188 countries.

Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Congo Difference Ahead
1990s 6.07 million 13.54 million 7.47 million Congo
2000s 6.24 million 13.91 million 7.67 million Congo
2010s 84.34 million 117.02 million 32.68 million Congo
2020s 247.62 million 247.64 million 23,933 Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 11_sdr allocation, Botswana or Congo?
Botswana, at 327.44 million against 312.19 million in Congo as of 2025.
What is the difference in 11_sdr allocation between Botswana and Congo?
15.26 million, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Congo?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Botswana and Congo rank globally for 11_sdr allocation?
Botswana ranks 132nd and Congo ranks 134th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
IMF, published as 11_SDR allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
11_SDR allocation
Source
IMF
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
189 places, 6,685 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

SDRs are international reserve assets created by the IMF and allocated to members to supplement existing official reserves. Holdings of SDRs by an IMF member are recorded as an asset, while the allocation of SDRs is recorded as the incurrence of a liability of the member receiving them. The membership of the SDR Department incurs the asset and liability position among themselves, not with the IMF. The holdings and allocations should be shown gross, rather than netted (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, sixth edition (BPM6)).