Bolivia vs Papua New Guinea: 11_SDR allocation
11_SDR allocation over time
- Bolivia
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Bolivia currently reports 523.85 million against 501.93 million in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 21.92 million.
Across all 36 years both countries report, Bolivia has been ahead every year.
Bolivia ranks 108th and Papua New Guinea ranks 109th of 188 countries.
Bolivia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bolivia | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 37.20 million | 12.96 million | 24.24 million | Bolivia |
| 2000s | 38.21 million | 13.31 million | 24.90 million | Bolivia |
| 2010s | 241.03 million | 184.29 million | 56.74 million | Bolivia |
| 2020s | 429.64 million | 396.94 million | 32.71 million | Bolivia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 11_sdr allocation, Bolivia or Papua New Guinea?
- Bolivia, at 523.85 million against 501.93 million in Papua New Guinea as of 2025.
- What is the difference in 11_sdr allocation between Bolivia and Papua New Guinea?
- 21.92 million, with Bolivia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Papua New Guinea?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Bolivia and Papua New Guinea rank globally for 11_sdr allocation?
- Bolivia ranks 108th and Papua New Guinea ranks 109th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- IMF, published as 11_SDR allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
SDRs are international reserve assets created by the IMF and allocated to members to supplement existing official reserves. Holdings of SDRs by an IMF member are recorded as an asset, while the allocation of SDRs is recorded as the incurrence of a liability of the member receiving them. The membership of the SDR Department incurs the asset and liability position among themselves, not with the IMF. The holdings and allocations should be shown gross, rather than netted (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, sixth edition (BPM6)).