Bhutan vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: 11_SDR allocation

Bhutan
33.94 million
in 2025
Saint Kitts and Nevis
27.22 million
in 2025
Bhutan rank
177th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
179th

11_SDR allocation over time

  • Bhutan
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
010.0M20.0M30.0M40.0M199020072025

How they compare

Bhutan currently reports 33.94 million against 27.22 million in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 6.72 million.

That makes Bhutan's figure about 1.2 times Saint Kitts and Nevis's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.

Bhutan ranks 177th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 179th of 188 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 1 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
1990s 0 0 0
2000s 0 0 0
2010s 8.80 million 12.49 million 3.69 million Saint Kitts and Nevis
2020s 25.68 million 22.31 million 3.37 million Bhutan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 11_sdr allocation, Bhutan or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Bhutan, at 33.94 million against 27.22 million in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2025.
What is the difference in 11_sdr allocation between Bhutan and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
6.72 million, with Bhutan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Bhutan and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for 11_sdr allocation?
Bhutan ranks 177th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 179th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
IMF, published as 11_SDR allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
11_SDR allocation
Source
IMF
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
189 places, 6,685 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

SDRs are international reserve assets created by the IMF and allocated to members to supplement existing official reserves. Holdings of SDRs by an IMF member are recorded as an asset, while the allocation of SDRs is recorded as the incurrence of a liability of the member receiving them. The membership of the SDR Department incurs the asset and liability position among themselves, not with the IMF. The holdings and allocations should be shown gross, rather than netted (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, sixth edition (BPM6)).