Bhutan vs Samoa: 11_SDR allocation

Bhutan
33.94 million
in 2025
Samoa
35.37 million
in 2025
Bhutan rank
177th
Samoa rank
175th

11_SDR allocation over time

  • Bhutan
  • Samoa
010.0M20.0M30.0M40.0M199020072025

How they compare

Samoa currently reports 35.37 million against 33.94 million in Bhutan, a difference of 1.43 million.

Across all 36 years both countries report, Samoa has been ahead every year.

Bhutan ranks 177th and Samoa ranks 175th of 188 countries.

Samoa has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan Samoa Difference Ahead
1990s 0 1.59 million 1.59 million Samoa
2000s 0 1.63 million 1.63 million Samoa
2010s 8.80 million 16.29 million 7.49 million Samoa
2020s 25.68 million 29.01 million 3.33 million Samoa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 11_sdr allocation, Bhutan or Samoa?
Samoa, at 35.37 million against 33.94 million in Bhutan as of 2025.
What is the difference in 11_sdr allocation between Bhutan and Samoa?
1.43 million, with Samoa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Samoa?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Bhutan and Samoa rank globally for 11_sdr allocation?
Bhutan ranks 177th and Samoa ranks 175th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
IMF, published as 11_SDR allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
11_SDR allocation
Source
IMF
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
189 places, 6,685 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

SDRs are international reserve assets created by the IMF and allocated to members to supplement existing official reserves. Holdings of SDRs by an IMF member are recorded as an asset, while the allocation of SDRs is recorded as the incurrence of a liability of the member receiving them. The membership of the SDR Department incurs the asset and liability position among themselves, not with the IMF. The holdings and allocations should be shown gross, rather than netted (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, sixth edition (BPM6)).