Belarus vs Ghana: 11_SDR allocation

Belarus
1.36 billion
in 2025
Ghana
1.41 billion
in 2025
Belarus rank
68th
Ghana rank
66th

11_SDR allocation over time

  • Belarus
  • Ghana
0500.0M1.0B1.5B199020072025

How they compare

Ghana currently reports 1.41 billion against 1.36 billion in Belarus, a difference of 52.32 million.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Ghana ahead.

Belarus ranks 68th and Ghana ranks 66th of 188 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Ghana in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Ghana Difference Ahead
1990s 0 87.74 million 87.74 million Ghana
2000s 0 90.13 million 90.13 million Ghana
2010s 541.35 million 519.65 million 21.70 million Belarus
2020s 1.09 billion 1.12 billion 28.46 million Ghana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 11_sdr allocation, Belarus or Ghana?
Ghana, at 1.41 billion against 1.36 billion in Belarus as of 2025.
What is the difference in 11_sdr allocation between Belarus and Ghana?
52.32 million, with Ghana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Ghana?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Belarus and Ghana rank globally for 11_sdr allocation?
Belarus ranks 68th and Ghana ranks 66th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
IMF, published as 11_SDR allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
11_SDR allocation
Source
IMF
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
189 places, 6,685 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

SDRs are international reserve assets created by the IMF and allocated to members to supplement existing official reserves. Holdings of SDRs by an IMF member are recorded as an asset, while the allocation of SDRs is recorded as the incurrence of a liability of the member receiving them. The membership of the SDR Department incurs the asset and liability position among themselves, not with the IMF. The holdings and allocations should be shown gross, rather than netted (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, sixth edition (BPM6)).