Bangladesh vs New Zealand: 11_SDR allocation

Bangladesh
2.04 billion
in 2025
New Zealand
2.73 billion
in 2025
Bangladesh rank
56th
New Zealand rank
54th

11_SDR allocation over time

  • Bangladesh
  • New Zealand
01.0B2.0B3.0B199020072025

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 2.73 billion against 2.04 billion in Bangladesh, a difference of 692.45 million.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.3 times Bangladesh's.

Across all 36 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.

Bangladesh ranks 56th and New Zealand ranks 54th of 188 countries.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh New Zealand Difference Ahead
1990s 65.65 million 196.88 million 131.24 million New Zealand
2000s 67.43 million 202.23 million 134.80 million New Zealand
2010s 749.53 million 1.25 billion 504.21 million New Zealand
2020s 1.61 billion 2.24 billion 626.53 million New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 11_sdr allocation, Bangladesh or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 2.73 billion against 2.04 billion in Bangladesh as of 2025.
What is the difference in 11_sdr allocation between Bangladesh and New Zealand?
692.45 million, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and New Zealand?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Bangladesh and New Zealand rank globally for 11_sdr allocation?
Bangladesh ranks 56th and New Zealand ranks 54th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
IMF, published as 11_SDR allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
11_SDR allocation
Source
IMF
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
189 places, 6,685 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

SDRs are international reserve assets created by the IMF and allocated to members to supplement existing official reserves. Holdings of SDRs by an IMF member are recorded as an asset, while the allocation of SDRs is recorded as the incurrence of a liability of the member receiving them. The membership of the SDR Department incurs the asset and liability position among themselves, not with the IMF. The holdings and allocations should be shown gross, rather than netted (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, sixth edition (BPM6)).