Bahamas vs Sierra Leone: 11_SDR allocation
11_SDR allocation over time
- Bahamas
- Sierra Leone
How they compare
Bahamas currently reports 405.88 million against 404.60 million in Sierra Leone, a difference of 1.28 million.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 37 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Sierra Leone ahead.
Bahamas ranks 120th and Sierra Leone ranks 122nd of 189 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Bahamas averaged higher in 2 and Sierra Leone in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahamas | Sierra Leone | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 14.25 million | 24.32 million | 10.07 million | Sierra Leone |
| 2000s | 14.64 million | 24.98 million | 10.34 million | Sierra Leone |
| 2010s | 182.70 million | 146.12 million | 36.58 million | Bahamas |
| 2020s | 337.43 million | 326.62 million | 10.81 million | Bahamas |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 11_sdr allocation, Bahamas or Sierra Leone?
- Bahamas, at 405.88 million against 404.60 million in Sierra Leone as of 2026.
- What is the difference in 11_sdr allocation between Bahamas and Sierra Leone?
- 1.28 million, with Bahamas ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Sierra Leone?
- 37 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2026.
- How do Bahamas and Sierra Leone rank globally for 11_sdr allocation?
- Bahamas ranks 120th and Sierra Leone ranks 122nd of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- IMF, published as 11_SDR allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
SDRs are international reserve assets created by the IMF and allocated to members to supplement existing official reserves. Holdings of SDRs by an IMF member are recorded as an asset, while the allocation of SDRs is recorded as the incurrence of a liability of the member receiving them. The membership of the SDR Department incurs the asset and liability position among themselves, not with the IMF. The holdings and allocations should be shown gross, rather than netted (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, sixth edition (BPM6)).