Bahamas vs Mozambique: 11_SDR allocation
11_SDR allocation over time
- Bahamas
- Mozambique
How they compare
Mozambique currently reports 433.95 million against 397.59 million in Bahamas, a difference of 36.36 million.
That makes Mozambique's figure about 1.1 times Bahamas's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Bahamas ahead.
Bahamas ranks 120th and Mozambique ranks 117th of 188 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Bahamas averaged higher in 3 and Mozambique in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahamas | Mozambique | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 14.25 million | 0 | 14.25 million | Bahamas |
| 2000s | 14.64 million | 0 | 14.64 million | Bahamas |
| 2010s | 182.70 million | 159.83 million | 22.87 million | Bahamas |
| 2020s | 326.02 million | 343.34 million | 17.32 million | Mozambique |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 11_sdr allocation, Bahamas or Mozambique?
- Mozambique, at 433.95 million against 397.59 million in Bahamas as of 2025.
- What is the difference in 11_sdr allocation between Bahamas and Mozambique?
- 36.36 million, with Mozambique ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Mozambique?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Bahamas and Mozambique rank globally for 11_sdr allocation?
- Bahamas ranks 120th and Mozambique ranks 117th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- IMF, published as 11_SDR allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
SDRs are international reserve assets created by the IMF and allocated to members to supplement existing official reserves. Holdings of SDRs by an IMF member are recorded as an asset, while the allocation of SDRs is recorded as the incurrence of a liability of the member receiving them. The membership of the SDR Department incurs the asset and liability position among themselves, not with the IMF. The holdings and allocations should be shown gross, rather than netted (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, sixth edition (BPM6)).