Azerbaijan vs Lithuania: 11_SDR allocation
11_SDR allocation over time
- Azerbaijan
- Lithuania
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 760.25 million against 717.53 million in Azerbaijan, a difference of 42.71 million.
That makes Lithuania's figure about 1.1 times Azerbaijan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 37 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Lithuania ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 93rd and Lithuania ranks 91st of 189 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Azerbaijan averaged higher in 1 and Lithuania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 225.53 million | 201.53 million | 23.99 million | Azerbaijan |
| 2020s | 570.15 million | 593.96 million | 23.81 million | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 11_sdr allocation, Azerbaijan or Lithuania?
- Lithuania, at 760.25 million against 717.53 million in Azerbaijan as of 2026.
- What is the difference in 11_sdr allocation between Azerbaijan and Lithuania?
- 42.71 million, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Lithuania?
- 37 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2026.
- How do Azerbaijan and Lithuania rank globally for 11_sdr allocation?
- Azerbaijan ranks 93rd and Lithuania ranks 91st of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- IMF, published as 11_SDR allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
SDRs are international reserve assets created by the IMF and allocated to members to supplement existing official reserves. Holdings of SDRs by an IMF member are recorded as an asset, while the allocation of SDRs is recorded as the incurrence of a liability of the member receiving them. The membership of the SDR Department incurs the asset and liability position among themselves, not with the IMF. The holdings and allocations should be shown gross, rather than netted (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, sixth edition (BPM6)).