Azerbaijan vs Costa Rica: 11_SDR allocation
11_SDR allocation over time
- Azerbaijan
- Costa Rica
How they compare
Azerbaijan currently reports 717.53 million against 692.56 million in Costa Rica, a difference of 24.98 million.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 37 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 93rd and Costa Rica ranks 95th of 189 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Azerbaijan averaged higher in 1 and Costa Rica in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Costa Rica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 | 33.06 million | 33.06 million | Costa Rica |
| 2000s | 0 | 33.95 million | 33.95 million | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 225.53 million | 229.87 million | 4.34 million | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 570.15 million | 553.60 million | 16.55 million | Azerbaijan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 11_sdr allocation, Azerbaijan or Costa Rica?
- Azerbaijan, at 717.53 million against 692.56 million in Costa Rica as of 2026.
- What is the difference in 11_sdr allocation between Azerbaijan and Costa Rica?
- 24.98 million, with Azerbaijan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Costa Rica?
- 37 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2026.
- How do Azerbaijan and Costa Rica rank globally for 11_sdr allocation?
- Azerbaijan ranks 93rd and Costa Rica ranks 95th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- IMF, published as 11_SDR allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
SDRs are international reserve assets created by the IMF and allocated to members to supplement existing official reserves. Holdings of SDRs by an IMF member are recorded as an asset, while the allocation of SDRs is recorded as the incurrence of a liability of the member receiving them. The membership of the SDR Department incurs the asset and liability position among themselves, not with the IMF. The holdings and allocations should be shown gross, rather than netted (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, sixth edition (BPM6)).