Azerbaijan vs Bahrain: 11_SDR allocation
11_SDR allocation over time
- Azerbaijan
- Bahrain
How they compare
Azerbaijan currently reports 702.88 million against 668.25 million in Bahrain, a difference of 34.63 million.
That makes Azerbaijan's figure about 1.1 times Bahrain's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Bahrain ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 93rd and Bahrain ranks 96th of 188 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Azerbaijan averaged higher in 2 and Bahrain in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Bahrain | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 | 8.64 million | 8.64 million | Bahrain |
| 2000s | 0 | 8.87 million | 8.87 million | Bahrain |
| 2010s | 225.53 million | 182.61 million | 42.92 million | Azerbaijan |
| 2020s | 545.58 million | 508.66 million | 36.92 million | Azerbaijan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 11_sdr allocation, Azerbaijan or Bahrain?
- Azerbaijan, at 702.88 million against 668.25 million in Bahrain as of 2025.
- What is the difference in 11_sdr allocation between Azerbaijan and Bahrain?
- 34.63 million, with Azerbaijan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Bahrain?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Azerbaijan and Bahrain rank globally for 11_sdr allocation?
- Azerbaijan ranks 93rd and Bahrain ranks 96th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- IMF, published as 11_SDR allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
SDRs are international reserve assets created by the IMF and allocated to members to supplement existing official reserves. Holdings of SDRs by an IMF member are recorded as an asset, while the allocation of SDRs is recorded as the incurrence of a liability of the member receiving them. The membership of the SDR Department incurs the asset and liability position among themselves, not with the IMF. The holdings and allocations should be shown gross, rather than netted (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, sixth edition (BPM6)).