Australia vs South Korea: 11_SDR allocation

Australia
12.47 billion
in 2025
South Korea
14.12 billion
in 2025
Australia rank
18th
South Korea rank
16th

11_SDR allocation over time

  • Australia
  • South Korea
05.0B10.0B15.0B199020072025

How they compare

South Korea currently reports 14.12 billion against 12.47 billion in Australia, a difference of 1.66 billion.

That makes South Korea's figure about 1.1 times Australia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 18th and South Korea ranks 16th of 188 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 3 and South Korea in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia South Korea Difference Ahead
1990s 655.54 million 101.58 million 553.97 million Australia
2000s 673.36 million 104.34 million 569.02 million Australia
2010s 4.53 billion 3.53 billion 996.70 million Australia
2020s 9.84 billion 10.65 billion 804.46 million South Korea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 11_sdr allocation, Australia or South Korea?
South Korea, at 14.12 billion against 12.47 billion in Australia as of 2025.
What is the difference in 11_sdr allocation between Australia and South Korea?
1.66 billion, with South Korea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and South Korea?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Australia and South Korea rank globally for 11_sdr allocation?
Australia ranks 18th and South Korea ranks 16th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
IMF, published as 11_SDR allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
11_SDR allocation
Source
IMF
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
189 places, 6,685 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

SDRs are international reserve assets created by the IMF and allocated to members to supplement existing official reserves. Holdings of SDRs by an IMF member are recorded as an asset, while the allocation of SDRs is recorded as the incurrence of a liability of the member receiving them. The membership of the SDR Department incurs the asset and liability position among themselves, not with the IMF. The holdings and allocations should be shown gross, rather than netted (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, sixth edition (BPM6)).