Argentina vs Denmark: 11_SDR allocation
11_SDR allocation over time
- Argentina
- Denmark
How they compare
Argentina currently reports 6.74 billion against 6.41 billion in Denmark, a difference of 328.11 million.
That makes Argentina's figure about 1.1 times Denmark's.
Across all 36 years both countries report, Argentina has been ahead every year.
Argentina ranks 27th and Denmark ranks 30th of 188 countries.
Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Denmark | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 443.54 million | 249.18 million | 194.36 million | Argentina |
| 2000s | 455.59 million | 255.96 million | 199.64 million | Argentina |
| 2010s | 2.97 billion | 2.25 billion | 717.46 million | Argentina |
| 2020s | 5.49 billion | 5.04 billion | 447.97 million | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 11_sdr allocation, Argentina or Denmark?
- Argentina, at 6.74 billion against 6.41 billion in Denmark as of 2025.
- What is the difference in 11_sdr allocation between Argentina and Denmark?
- 328.11 million, with Argentina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Denmark?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Argentina and Denmark rank globally for 11_sdr allocation?
- Argentina ranks 27th and Denmark ranks 30th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- IMF, published as 11_SDR allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
SDRs are international reserve assets created by the IMF and allocated to members to supplement existing official reserves. Holdings of SDRs by an IMF member are recorded as an asset, while the allocation of SDRs is recorded as the incurrence of a liability of the member receiving them. The membership of the SDR Department incurs the asset and liability position among themselves, not with the IMF. The holdings and allocations should be shown gross, rather than netted (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, sixth edition (BPM6)).