Antigua and Barbuda vs East Timor: 11_SDR allocation
11_SDR allocation over time
- Antigua and Barbuda
- East Timor
How they compare
East Timor currently reports 42.87 million against 42.08 million in Antigua and Barbuda, a difference of 791,500.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was East Timor ahead.
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 169th and East Timor ranks 167th of 188 countries.
Antigua and Barbuda has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Antigua and Barbuda | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 18.36 million | 11.35 million | 7.01 million | Antigua and Barbuda |
| 2020s | 34.19 million | 32.52 million | 1.68 million | Antigua and Barbuda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 11_sdr allocation, Antigua and Barbuda or East Timor?
- East Timor, at 42.87 million against 42.08 million in Antigua and Barbuda as of 2025.
- What is the difference in 11_sdr allocation between Antigua and Barbuda and East Timor?
- 791,500, with East Timor ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and East Timor?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Antigua and Barbuda and East Timor rank globally for 11_sdr allocation?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 169th and East Timor ranks 167th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- IMF, published as 11_SDR allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
SDRs are international reserve assets created by the IMF and allocated to members to supplement existing official reserves. Holdings of SDRs by an IMF member are recorded as an asset, while the allocation of SDRs is recorded as the incurrence of a liability of the member receiving them. The membership of the SDR Department incurs the asset and liability position among themselves, not with the IMF. The holdings and allocations should be shown gross, rather than netted (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, sixth edition (BPM6)).