Antigua and Barbuda vs Eritrea: 11_SDR allocation
11_SDR allocation over time
- Antigua and Barbuda
- Eritrea
How they compare
Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 42.95 million against 41.23 million in Eritrea, a difference of 1.72 million.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 37 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Eritrea ahead.
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 170th and Eritrea ranks 171st of 189 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Antigua and Barbuda averaged higher in 1 and Eritrea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Antigua and Barbuda | Eritrea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 18.36 million | 22.26 million | 3.90 million | Eritrea |
| 2020s | 35.45 million | 35.28 million | 166,643 | Antigua and Barbuda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 11_sdr allocation, Antigua and Barbuda or Eritrea?
- Antigua and Barbuda, at 42.95 million against 41.23 million in Eritrea as of 2026.
- What is the difference in 11_sdr allocation between Antigua and Barbuda and Eritrea?
- 1.72 million, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Eritrea?
- 37 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2026.
- How do Antigua and Barbuda and Eritrea rank globally for 11_sdr allocation?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 170th and Eritrea ranks 171st of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- IMF, published as 11_SDR allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
SDRs are international reserve assets created by the IMF and allocated to members to supplement existing official reserves. Holdings of SDRs by an IMF member are recorded as an asset, while the allocation of SDRs is recorded as the incurrence of a liability of the member receiving them. The membership of the SDR Department incurs the asset and liability position among themselves, not with the IMF. The holdings and allocations should be shown gross, rather than netted (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, sixth edition (BPM6)).