Angola vs Qatar: 11_SDR allocation

Angola
1.31 billion
in 2025
Qatar
1.27 billion
in 2025
Angola rank
70th
Qatar rank
72nd

11_SDR allocation over time

  • Angola
  • Qatar
0500.0M1.0B1.5B199020072025

How they compare

Angola currently reports 1.31 billion against 1.27 billion in Qatar, a difference of 35.07 million.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Qatar ahead.

Angola ranks 70th and Qatar ranks 72nd of 188 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 2 and Qatar in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Qatar Difference Ahead
1990s 0 17.86 million 17.86 million Qatar
2000s 0 18.35 million 18.35 million Qatar
2010s 400.91 million 369.19 million 31.73 million Angola
2020s 1.01 billion 973.81 million 33.69 million Angola

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 11_sdr allocation, Angola or Qatar?
Angola, at 1.31 billion against 1.27 billion in Qatar as of 2025.
What is the difference in 11_sdr allocation between Angola and Qatar?
35.07 million, with Angola ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Qatar?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Angola and Qatar rank globally for 11_sdr allocation?
Angola ranks 70th and Qatar ranks 72nd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
IMF, published as 11_SDR allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
11_SDR allocation
Source
IMF
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
189 places, 6,685 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

SDRs are international reserve assets created by the IMF and allocated to members to supplement existing official reserves. Holdings of SDRs by an IMF member are recorded as an asset, while the allocation of SDRs is recorded as the incurrence of a liability of the member receiving them. The membership of the SDR Department incurs the asset and liability position among themselves, not with the IMF. The holdings and allocations should be shown gross, rather than netted (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, sixth edition (BPM6)).