Angola vs Belarus: 11_SDR allocation

Angola
1.31 billion
in 2025
Belarus
1.36 billion
in 2025
Angola rank
70th
Belarus rank
68th

11_SDR allocation over time

  • Angola
  • Belarus
0500.0M1.0B1.5B199020072025

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 1.36 billion against 1.31 billion in Angola, a difference of 52.44 million.

Across all 36 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.

Angola ranks 70th and Belarus ranks 68th of 188 countries.

Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Belarus Difference Ahead
1990s 0 0 0 β€”
2000s 0 0 0 β€”
2010s 400.91 million 541.35 million 140.44 million Belarus
2020s 1.01 billion 1.09 billion 79.74 million Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 11_sdr allocation, Angola or Belarus?
Belarus, at 1.36 billion against 1.31 billion in Angola as of 2025.
What is the difference in 11_sdr allocation between Angola and Belarus?
52.44 million, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Belarus?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Angola and Belarus rank globally for 11_sdr allocation?
Angola ranks 70th and Belarus ranks 68th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
IMF, published as 11_SDR allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
11_SDR allocation
Source
IMF
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
189 places, 6,685 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

SDRs are international reserve assets created by the IMF and allocated to members to supplement existing official reserves. Holdings of SDRs by an IMF member are recorded as an asset, while the allocation of SDRs is recorded as the incurrence of a liability of the member receiving them. The membership of the SDR Department incurs the asset and liability position among themselves, not with the IMF. The holdings and allocations should be shown gross, rather than netted (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, sixth edition (BPM6)).