Albania vs Burkina Faso: 11_SDR allocation
11_SDR allocation over time
- Albania
- Burkina Faso
How they compare
Albania currently reports 239.12 million against 229.84 million in Burkina Faso, a difference of 9.28 million.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Burkina Faso ahead.
Albania ranks 149th and Burkina Faso ranks 151st of 188 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Albania averaged higher in 1 and Burkina Faso in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Albania | Burkina Faso | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 | 13.11 million | 13.11 million | Burkina Faso |
| 2000s | 0 | 13.46 million | 13.46 million | Burkina Faso |
| 2010s | 68.21 million | 84.56 million | 16.35 million | Burkina Faso |
| 2020s | 182.92 million | 181.82 million | 1.10 million | Albania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 11_sdr allocation, Albania or Burkina Faso?
- Albania, at 239.12 million against 229.84 million in Burkina Faso as of 2025.
- What is the difference in 11_sdr allocation between Albania and Burkina Faso?
- 9.28 million, with Albania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Albania and Burkina Faso?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Albania and Burkina Faso rank globally for 11_sdr allocation?
- Albania ranks 149th and Burkina Faso ranks 151st of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- IMF, published as 11_SDR allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
SDRs are international reserve assets created by the IMF and allocated to members to supplement existing official reserves. Holdings of SDRs by an IMF member are recorded as an asset, while the allocation of SDRs is recorded as the incurrence of a liability of the member receiving them. The membership of the SDR Department incurs the asset and liability position among themselves, not with the IMF. The holdings and allocations should be shown gross, rather than netted (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, sixth edition (BPM6)).