Brazil vs Tunisia: 11_SDR allocation, per capita
Brazil
84.1 units per person
in 2025
Tunisia
85.58 units per person
in 2025
Brazil rank
109th
Tunisia rank
107th
11_SDR allocation, per capita over time
- Brazil
- Tunisia
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 85.58 units per person against 84.1 units per person in Brazil, a difference of 1.48 units per person.
Across all 36 years both countries report, Tunisia has been ahead every year.
Brazil ranks 109th and Tunisia ranks 107th of 189 countries.
Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.12 units per person | 5.28 units per person | 2.16 units per person | Tunisia |
| 2000s | 2.79 units per person | 4.8 units per person | 2 units per person | Tunisia |
| 2010s | 21.15 units per person | 35.44 units per person | 14.29 units per person | Tunisia |
| 2020s | 63.5 units per person | 68.82 units per person | 5.32 units per person | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 11_sdr allocation, per capita, Brazil or Tunisia?
- Tunisia, at 85.58 units per person against 84.1 units per person in Brazil as of 2025.
- What is the difference in 11_sdr allocation, per capita between Brazil and Tunisia?
- 1.48 units per person, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Tunisia?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Brazil and Tunisia rank globally for 11_sdr allocation, per capita?
- Brazil ranks 109th and Tunisia ranks 107th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as 11_SDR allocation, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
11_SDR allocation divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.