Brazil vs Iraq: 11_SDR allocation, per capita
Brazil
84.1 units per person
in 2025
Iraq
77.12 units per person
in 2025
Brazil rank
109th
Iraq rank
112th
11_SDR allocation, per capita over time
- Brazil
- Iraq
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 84.1 units per person against 77.12 units per person in Iraq, a difference of 6.98 units per person.
That makes Brazil's figure about 1.1 times Iraq's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Iraq ahead.
Brazil ranks 109th and Iraq ranks 112th of 189 countries.
Iraq has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Iraq | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.12 units per person | 4.72 units per person | 1.6 units per person | Iraq |
| 2000s | 2.79 units per person | 3.57 units per person | 0.7743 units per person | Iraq |
| 2010s | 21.15 units per person | 46.14 units per person | 24.99 units per person | Iraq |
| 2020s | 63.5 units per person | 66.13 units per person | 2.62 units per person | Iraq |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 11_sdr allocation, per capita, Brazil or Iraq?
- Brazil, at 84.1 units per person against 77.12 units per person in Iraq as of 2025.
- What is the difference in 11_sdr allocation, per capita between Brazil and Iraq?
- 6.98 units per person, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Iraq?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Brazil and Iraq rank globally for 11_sdr allocation, per capita?
- Brazil ranks 109th and Iraq ranks 112th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as 11_SDR allocation, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
11_SDR allocation divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.