Namibia vs Uganda: 11_SDR allocation, annual growth rate
Namibia
0.351 % change on previous year
in 2025
Uganda
0.351 % change on previous year
in 2025
Namibia rank
77th
Uganda rank
75th
11_SDR allocation, annual growth rate over time
- Namibia
- Uganda
How they compare
Uganda currently reports 0.351 % change on previous year against 0.351 % change on previous year in Namibia, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Namibia ahead.
Namibia ranks 77th and Uganda ranks 75th of 189 countries.
Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | -0.8516 % change on previous year | -0.8516 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | Uganda |
| 2020s | 22.13 % change on previous year | 31.8 % change on previous year | 9.67 % change on previous year | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 11_sdr allocation, annual growth rate, Namibia or Uganda?
- Uganda, at 0.351 % change on previous year against 0.351 % change on previous year in Namibia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in 11_sdr allocation, annual growth rate between Namibia and Uganda?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Uganda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Uganda?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2025.
- How do Namibia and Uganda rank globally for 11_sdr allocation, annual growth rate?
- Namibia ranks 77th and Uganda ranks 75th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as 11_SDR allocation, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in 11_SDR allocation. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.