Belarus vs China: 11_SDR allocation, annual growth rate
Belarus
0.3511 % change on previous year
in 2025
China
0.3511 % change on previous year
in 2025
Belarus rank
28th
China rank
31st
11_SDR allocation, annual growth rate over time
- Belarus
- China
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 0.3511 % change on previous year against 0.3511 % change on previous year in China, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2011 it was China ahead.
Belarus ranks 28th and China ranks 31st of 189 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and China in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | -0.8516 % change on previous year | -0.8517 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | Belarus |
| 2020s | 28.1 % change on previous year | 67.25 % change on previous year | 39.15 % change on previous year | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 11_sdr allocation, annual growth rate, Belarus or China?
- Belarus, at 0.3511 % change on previous year against 0.3511 % change on previous year in China as of 2025.
- What is the difference in 11_sdr allocation, annual growth rate between Belarus and China?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and China?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2025.
- How do Belarus and China rank globally for 11_sdr allocation, annual growth rate?
- Belarus ranks 28th and China ranks 31st of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as 11_SDR allocation, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in 11_SDR allocation. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.