Equatorial Guinea vs Iran: 09_Insured export credit exposures, Berne Union
09_Insured export credit exposures, Berne Union over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Iran
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 149.00 million against 120.00 million in Iran, a difference of 29.00 million.
That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.2 times Iran's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Iran ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 175th and Iran ranks 178th of 210 countries.
Iran has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Iran | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 232.20 million | 25.64 billion | 25.40 billion | Iran |
| 2010s | 166.60 million | 7.38 billion | 7.21 billion | Iran |
| 2020s | 194.33 million | 395.50 million | 201.17 million | Iran |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 09_insured export credit exposures, berne union, Equatorial Guinea or Iran?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 149.00 million against 120.00 million in Iran as of 2025.
- What is the difference in 09_insured export credit exposures, berne union between Equatorial Guinea and Iran?
- 29.00 million, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Iran?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Iran rank globally for 09_insured export credit exposures, berne union?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 175th and Iran ranks 178th of 210 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- BIS, published as 09_Insured export credit exposures, Berne Union. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Data refer to Berne Union members’ direct insurance or lending, i.e. amount reinsured by others are not deducted and amounts reinsured by members for others are not added. Countries are defined based on ISO 3166-1. Amounts guaranteed by an international financial institution are allocated to that institution, not the country of residence of the borrower or guarantor. Data are stock data, i.e. total outstanding amounts at the end of each quarter (31 March, 30 June, 30 September, and 31 December). Total data include medium/long-term (MLT) exposures and short-term (ST) exposures.