Cayman Islands vs Sri Lanka: 09_Insured export credit exposures, Berne Union
09_Insured export credit exposures, Berne Union over time
- Cayman Islands
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 2.32 billion against 2.16 billion in Cayman Islands, a difference of 156.00 million.
That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 1.1 times Cayman Islands's.
Across all 21 years both countries report, Sri Lanka has been ahead every year.
Cayman Islands ranks 104th and Sri Lanka ranks 102nd of 211 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cayman Islands | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 735.00 million | 1.32 billion | 588.80 million | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 1.56 billion | 3.33 billion | 1.77 billion | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 2.17 billion | 4.03 billion | 1.86 billion | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 09_insured export credit exposures, berne union, Cayman Islands or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 2.32 billion against 2.16 billion in Cayman Islands as of 2025.
- What is the difference in 09_insured export credit exposures, berne union between Cayman Islands and Sri Lanka?
- 156.00 million, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cayman Islands and Sri Lanka?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do Cayman Islands and Sri Lanka rank globally for 09_insured export credit exposures, berne union?
- Cayman Islands ranks 104th and Sri Lanka ranks 102nd of 211 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- BIS, published as 09_Insured export credit exposures, Berne Union. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Data refer to Berne Union members’ direct insurance or lending, i.e. amount reinsured by others are not deducted and amounts reinsured by members for others are not added. Countries are defined based on ISO 3166-1. Amounts guaranteed by an international financial institution are allocated to that institution, not the country of residence of the borrower or guarantor. Data are stock data, i.e. total outstanding amounts at the end of each quarter (31 March, 30 June, 30 September, and 31 December). Total data include medium/long-term (MLT) exposures and short-term (ST) exposures.