South Africa vs Zimbabwe: 08_Multilateral loans, other institutions, per square kilometre

South Africa
3,501 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
3,087 units per square kilometre
in 2023
South Africa rank
109th
Zimbabwe rank
112th

08_Multilateral loans, other institutions, per square kilometre over time

  • South Africa
  • Zimbabwe
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k199620092023

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 3,501 units per square kilometre against 3,087 units per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 414 units per square kilometre.

That makes South Africa's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

South Africa ranks 109th and Zimbabwe ranks 112th of 214 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, South Africa averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Africa Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 409.7 units per square kilometre 4,177 units per square kilometre 3,768 units per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 177.62 units per square kilometre 3,236 units per square kilometre 3,059 units per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 2,426 units per square kilometre 2,933 units per square kilometre 506.77 units per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 3,340 units per square kilometre 3,125 units per square kilometre 214.26 units per square kilometre South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 08_multilateral loans, other institutions, per square kilometre, South Africa or Zimbabwe?
South Africa, at 3,501 units per square kilometre against 3,087 units per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in 08_multilateral loans, other institutions, per square kilometre between South Africa and Zimbabwe?
414 units per square kilometre, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Zimbabwe?
28 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2023.
How do South Africa and Zimbabwe rank globally for 08_multilateral loans, other institutions, per square kilometre?
South Africa ranks 109th and Zimbabwe ranks 112th of 214 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as 08_Multilateral loans, other institutions, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Africa vs Zimbabwe: 08_Multilateral loans, other institutions, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/08-multilateral-loans-other-institutions-per-square-kilometre/south-africa/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/08-multilateral-loans-other-institutions-per-square-kilometre/south-africa/zimbabwe/">South Africa vs Zimbabwe: 08_Multilateral loans, other institutions, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
08_Multilateral loans, other institutions, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
216 places, 5,491 data points, 1996–2023
Last refreshed

08_Multilateral loans, other institutions divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.