Chile vs South Africa: 08_Multilateral loans, other institutions, per square kilometre

Chile
3,410 units per square kilometre
in 2023
South Africa
3,501 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
111th
South Africa rank
109th

08_Multilateral loans, other institutions, per square kilometre over time

  • Chile
  • South Africa
02.0k4.0k6.0k199620092023

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 3,501 units per square kilometre against 3,410 units per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 91 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 28 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 111th and South Africa ranks 109th of 214 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 2 and South Africa in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile South Africa Difference Ahead
1990s 2,949 units per square kilometre 409.7 units per square kilometre 2,539 units per square kilometre Chile
2000s 1,481 units per square kilometre 177.62 units per square kilometre 1,303 units per square kilometre Chile
2010s 1,246 units per square kilometre 2,426 units per square kilometre 1,180 units per square kilometre South Africa
2020s 2,529 units per square kilometre 3,340 units per square kilometre 810.72 units per square kilometre South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 08_multilateral loans, other institutions, per square kilometre, Chile or South Africa?
South Africa, at 3,501 units per square kilometre against 3,410 units per square kilometre in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in 08_multilateral loans, other institutions, per square kilometre between Chile and South Africa?
91 units per square kilometre, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and South Africa?
28 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2023.
How do Chile and South Africa rank globally for 08_multilateral loans, other institutions, per square kilometre?
Chile ranks 111th and South Africa ranks 109th of 214 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as 08_Multilateral loans, other institutions, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs South Africa: 08_Multilateral loans, other institutions, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/08-multilateral-loans-other-institutions-per-square-kilometre/chile/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/08-multilateral-loans-other-institutions-per-square-kilometre/chile/south-africa/">Chile vs South Africa: 08_Multilateral loans, other institutions, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
08_Multilateral loans, other institutions, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
216 places, 5,491 data points, 1996–2023
Last refreshed

08_Multilateral loans, other institutions divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.