Kazakhstan vs Romania: 07_Multilateral loans, IMF, per capita
Kazakhstan
0 units per person
in 2025
Romania
0 units per person
in 2025
Kazakhstan rank
93rd
Romania rank
93rd
07_Multilateral loans, IMF, per capita over time
- Kazakhstan
- Romania
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Romania, a difference of 0 units per person.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Romania ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 93rd and Romania ranks 93rd of 187 countries.
Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 16.2 units per person | 31.43 units per person | 15.23 units per person | Romania |
| 2000s | 2.62 units per person | 13.32 units per person | 10.7 units per person | Romania |
| 2010s | 0 units per person | 326.77 units per person | 326.77 units per person | Romania |
| 2020s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 07_multilateral loans, imf, per capita, Kazakhstan or Romania?
- Kazakhstan, at 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Romania as of 2025.
- What is the difference in 07_multilateral loans, imf, per capita between Kazakhstan and Romania?
- 0 units per person, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Romania?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Kazakhstan and Romania rank globally for 07_multilateral loans, imf, per capita?
- Kazakhstan ranks 93rd and Romania ranks 93rd of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as 07_Multilateral loans, IMF, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
07_Multilateral loans, IMF divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.