Guatemala vs Latvia: 07_Multilateral loans, IMF, per capita
Guatemala
0 units per person
in 2025
Latvia
0 units per person
in 2025
Guatemala rank
93rd
Latvia rank
93rd
07_Multilateral loans, IMF, per capita over time
- Guatemala
- Latvia
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Latvia, a difference of 0 units per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Guatemala ahead.
Guatemala ranks 93rd and Latvia ranks 93rd of 187 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.26 units per person | 29.28 units per person | 27.02 units per person | Latvia |
| 2000s | 0 units per person | 42.17 units per person | 42.17 units per person | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0 units per person | 209.89 units per person | 209.89 units per person | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 07_multilateral loans, imf, per capita, Guatemala or Latvia?
- Guatemala, at 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Latvia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in 07_multilateral loans, imf, per capita between Guatemala and Latvia?
- 0 units per person, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Latvia?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Guatemala and Latvia rank globally for 07_multilateral loans, imf, per capita?
- Guatemala ranks 93rd and Latvia ranks 93rd of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as 07_Multilateral loans, IMF, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
07_Multilateral loans, IMF divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.