Gambia vs Rwanda: 07_Multilateral loans, IMF, per capita
Gambia
55.36 units per person
in 2025
Rwanda
55.34 units per person
in 2025
Gambia rank
38th
Rwanda rank
39th
07_Multilateral loans, IMF, per capita over time
- Gambia
- Rwanda
How they compare
Gambia currently reports 55.36 units per person against 55.34 units per person in Rwanda, a difference of 0.02 units per person.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Gambia ahead.
Gambia ranks 38th and Rwanda ranks 39th of 187 countries.
Gambia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gambia | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 25.35 units per person | 2.77 units per person | 22.58 units per person | Gambia |
| 2000s | 13.14 units per person | 6.15 units per person | 6.99 units per person | Gambia |
| 2010s | 18.63 units per person | 3.56 units per person | 15.07 units per person | Gambia |
| 2020s | 40.42 units per person | 30.32 units per person | 10.1 units per person | Gambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 07_multilateral loans, imf, per capita, Gambia or Rwanda?
- Gambia, at 55.36 units per person against 55.34 units per person in Rwanda as of 2025.
- What is the difference in 07_multilateral loans, imf, per capita between Gambia and Rwanda?
- 0.02 units per person, with Gambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Rwanda?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Gambia and Rwanda rank globally for 07_multilateral loans, imf, per capita?
- Gambia ranks 38th and Rwanda ranks 39th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as 07_Multilateral loans, IMF, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
07_Multilateral loans, IMF divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.