Egypt vs Sri Lanka: 07_Multilateral loans, IMF, per capita
Egypt
96.82 units per person
in 2025
Sri Lanka
92.59 units per person
in 2025
Egypt rank
24th
Sri Lanka rank
27th
07_Multilateral loans, IMF, per capita over time
- Egypt
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Egypt currently reports 96.82 units per person against 92.59 units per person in Sri Lanka, a difference of 4.23 units per person.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Egypt ranks 24th and Sri Lanka ranks 27th of 187 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 1 and Sri Lanka in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.84 units per person | 26.07 units per person | 24.24 units per person | Sri Lanka |
| 2000s | 0 units per person | 13.35 units per person | 13.35 units per person | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 17.74 units per person | 60.51 units per person | 42.77 units per person | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 137.28 units per person | 66.98 units per person | 70.31 units per person | Egypt |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 07_multilateral loans, imf, per capita, Egypt or Sri Lanka?
- Egypt, at 96.82 units per person against 92.59 units per person in Sri Lanka as of 2025.
- What is the difference in 07_multilateral loans, imf, per capita between Egypt and Sri Lanka?
- 4.23 units per person, with Egypt ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Sri Lanka?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Egypt and Sri Lanka rank globally for 07_multilateral loans, imf, per capita?
- Egypt ranks 24th and Sri Lanka ranks 27th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as 07_Multilateral loans, IMF, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
07_Multilateral loans, IMF divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.