Croatia vs Czechia: 07_Multilateral loans, IMF, per capita
Croatia
0 units per person
in 2025
Czechia
0 units per person
in 2025
Croatia rank
93rd
Czechia rank
93rd
07_Multilateral loans, IMF, per capita over time
- Croatia
- Czechia
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Czechia, a difference of 0 units per person.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Czechia ahead.
Croatia ranks 93rd and Czechia ranks 93rd of 187 countries.
Croatia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Czechia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 24.18 units per person | 20.25 units per person | 3.93 units per person | Croatia |
| 2000s | 10.63 units per person | 0 units per person | 10.63 units per person | Croatia |
| 2010s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | — |
| 2020s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 07_multilateral loans, imf, per capita, Croatia or Czechia?
- Croatia, at 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Czechia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in 07_multilateral loans, imf, per capita between Croatia and Czechia?
- 0 units per person, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Czechia?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Croatia and Czechia rank globally for 07_multilateral loans, imf, per capita?
- Croatia ranks 93rd and Czechia ranks 93rd of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as 07_Multilateral loans, IMF, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
07_Multilateral loans, IMF divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.