China vs Uruguay: 07_Multilateral loans, IMF, per capita
China
0 units per person
in 2025
Uruguay
0 units per person
in 2025
China rank
93rd
Uruguay rank
93rd
07_Multilateral loans, IMF, per capita over time
- China
- Uruguay
How they compare
China currently reports 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Uruguay, a difference of 0 units per person.
Across all 36 years both countries report, Uruguay has been ahead every year.
China ranks 93rd and Uruguay ranks 93rd of 187 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0933 units per person | 19.25 units per person | 19.16 units per person | Uruguay |
| 2000s | 0 units per person | 290.33 units per person | 290.33 units per person | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | — |
| 2020s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 07_multilateral loans, imf, per capita, China or Uruguay?
- China, at 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Uruguay as of 2025.
- What is the difference in 07_multilateral loans, imf, per capita between China and Uruguay?
- 0 units per person, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Uruguay?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do China and Uruguay rank globally for 07_multilateral loans, imf, per capita?
- China ranks 93rd and Uruguay ranks 93rd of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as 07_Multilateral loans, IMF, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
07_Multilateral loans, IMF divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.