China vs South Korea: 07_Multilateral loans, IMF, per capita
China
0 units per person
in 2025
South Korea
0 units per person
in 2025
China rank
93rd
South Korea rank
93rd
07_Multilateral loans, IMF, per capita over time
- China
- South Korea
How they compare
China currently reports 0 units per person against 0 units per person in South Korea, a difference of 0 units per person.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was China ahead.
China ranks 93rd and South Korea ranks 93rd of 187 countries.
South Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | South Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0933 units per person | 62.91 units per person | 62.82 units per person | South Korea |
| 2000s | 0 units per person | 19.15 units per person | 19.15 units per person | South Korea |
| 2010s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | — |
| 2020s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 07_multilateral loans, imf, per capita, China or South Korea?
- China, at 0 units per person against 0 units per person in South Korea as of 2025.
- What is the difference in 07_multilateral loans, imf, per capita between China and South Korea?
- 0 units per person, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and South Korea?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do China and South Korea rank globally for 07_multilateral loans, imf, per capita?
- China ranks 93rd and South Korea ranks 93rd of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as 07_Multilateral loans, IMF, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
07_Multilateral loans, IMF divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.