Brazil vs Laos: 07_Multilateral loans, IMF, per capita
Brazil
0 units per person
in 2025
Laos
0 units per person
in 2025
Brazil rank
93rd
Laos rank
93rd
07_Multilateral loans, IMF, per capita over time
- Brazil
- Laos
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Laos, a difference of 0 units per person.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 93rd and Laos ranks 93rd of 187 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 1 and Laos in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Laos | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6.95 units per person | 8.51 units per person | 1.56 units per person | Laos |
| 2000s | 51.63 units per person | 6.06 units per person | 45.57 units per person | Brazil |
| 2010s | 0 units per person | 0.3826 units per person | 0.3826 units per person | Laos |
| 2020s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 07_multilateral loans, imf, per capita, Brazil or Laos?
- Brazil, at 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Laos as of 2025.
- What is the difference in 07_multilateral loans, imf, per capita between Brazil and Laos?
- 0 units per person, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Laos?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Brazil and Laos rank globally for 07_multilateral loans, imf, per capita?
- Brazil ranks 93rd and Laos ranks 93rd of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as 07_Multilateral loans, IMF, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
07_Multilateral loans, IMF divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.