Belarus vs Latvia: 07_Multilateral loans, IMF, per capita
Belarus
0 units per person
in 2025
Latvia
0 units per person
in 2025
Belarus rank
93rd
Latvia rank
93rd
07_Multilateral loans, IMF, per capita over time
- Belarus
- Latvia
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Latvia, a difference of 0 units per person.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Latvia ahead.
Belarus ranks 93rd and Latvia ranks 93rd of 187 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 13.07 units per person | 29.28 units per person | 16.21 units per person | Latvia |
| 2000s | 11.87 units per person | 42.17 units per person | 30.3 units per person | Latvia |
| 2010s | 150.75 units per person | 209.89 units per person | 59.15 units per person | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 07_multilateral loans, imf, per capita, Belarus or Latvia?
- Belarus, at 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Latvia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in 07_multilateral loans, imf, per capita between Belarus and Latvia?
- 0 units per person, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Latvia?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Belarus and Latvia rank globally for 07_multilateral loans, imf, per capita?
- Belarus ranks 93rd and Latvia ranks 93rd of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as 07_Multilateral loans, IMF, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
07_Multilateral loans, IMF divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.