Angola vs Ghana: 07_Multilateral loans, IMF, per capita
Angola
96.64 units per person
in 2025
Ghana
93.89 units per person
in 2025
Angola rank
25th
Ghana rank
26th
07_Multilateral loans, IMF, per capita over time
- Angola
- Ghana
How they compare
Angola currently reports 96.64 units per person against 93.89 units per person in Ghana, a difference of 2.75 units per person.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Ghana ahead.
Angola ranks 25th and Ghana ranks 26th of 187 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 2 and Ghana in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Ghana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 units per person | 37.76 units per person | 37.76 units per person | Ghana |
| 2000s | 0 units per person | 12.4 units per person | 12.4 units per person | Ghana |
| 2010s | 24.38 units per person | 24.34 units per person | 0.0434 units per person | Angola |
| 2020s | 96.38 units per person | 62.65 units per person | 33.73 units per person | Angola |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 07_multilateral loans, imf, per capita, Angola or Ghana?
- Angola, at 96.64 units per person against 93.89 units per person in Ghana as of 2025.
- What is the difference in 07_multilateral loans, imf, per capita between Angola and Ghana?
- 2.75 units per person, with Angola ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Ghana?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Angola and Ghana rank globally for 07_multilateral loans, imf, per capita?
- Angola ranks 25th and Ghana ranks 26th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as 07_Multilateral loans, IMF, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
07_Multilateral loans, IMF divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.