Angola vs Egypt: 07_Multilateral loans, IMF, per capita
Angola
96.64 units per person
in 2025
Egypt
96.82 units per person
in 2025
Angola rank
25th
Egypt rank
24th
07_Multilateral loans, IMF, per capita over time
- Angola
- Egypt
How they compare
Egypt currently reports 96.82 units per person against 96.64 units per person in Angola, a difference of 0.18 units per person.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Egypt ahead.
Angola ranks 25th and Egypt ranks 24th of 187 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 1 and Egypt in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Egypt | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 units per person | 1.84 units per person | 1.84 units per person | Egypt |
| 2000s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | — |
| 2010s | 24.38 units per person | 17.74 units per person | 6.64 units per person | Angola |
| 2020s | 96.38 units per person | 137.28 units per person | 40.9 units per person | Egypt |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 07_multilateral loans, imf, per capita, Angola or Egypt?
- Egypt, at 96.82 units per person against 96.64 units per person in Angola as of 2025.
- What is the difference in 07_multilateral loans, imf, per capita between Angola and Egypt?
- 0.18 units per person, with Egypt ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Egypt?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Angola and Egypt rank globally for 07_multilateral loans, imf, per capita?
- Angola ranks 25th and Egypt ranks 24th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as 07_Multilateral loans, IMF, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
07_Multilateral loans, IMF divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.